Spider-Man 3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a208/5a208275bb00421ff242ccc388aeaf3507414d68" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7192d/7192d307dd7705d65d5d59d4eb14355c2236c8a8" alt=""
Spidey Goes Goth
Spider-Man is back! The web-slinger returns to excite crowds and rake in a ton of cash as the first official summer movie, Spider-Man 3. All the principals have returned, others have joined, and the running time is very long. Does this arachnid chapter measure up to the last two, or does it suffer from sequelitis? Critic-proof as it is (it’s already made $247 million as of this writing), does it deliver? While it is entertaining, SM3 suffers from lack of focus, hyperactive action, and too much blubbering.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21fe0/21fe083abb82e0f6e9463b8bfdab1ef59468efb0" alt=""
The biggest problem this movie has is that it develops a less interesting storyline (Sandman), at the expense of a very interesting one (Venom). Thomas Hayden Church (Sideways) does okay with the material he is given, but the story is trite (sad sack crook who just wants to pay for his daughter’s treatments), and doesn’t fit well into the Peter Parker universe, even though the writers try to shoehorn it in there.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/205e5/205e5871d8b69d314f4f721f73e6c14c87f9a4f6" alt=""
Another problem is the frantic pace of the action sequences. Director Sam Raimi is noteworthy for how much control he exhibits on the screen, but he seems to have lost some of that here. The first clash between Spidey and the New Goblin is so out of control, you can’t follow it, and often suffer from vertigo due to the rapid movement and cutting. Things do settle down after this, but this should be a lesson to any filmmaker: faster is not better, only more confusing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81a04/81a04013bfe10c160d524aae94f03001681ea4bf" alt=""
Comments