Shrek the Third
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a844/3a8447d667e00b20d5f8b1cdf5dda64f587dff46" alt=""
It Ain’t Easy Being Green
The March of the Sequels continues in the month of May with another installment of that lovable Ogre voiced by Fat Bastard, er, Mike Myers. Yep, Shrek the Third continues the story of the Big Green and his Ogre-iffic wife Fiona (Cameron Diaz), sidekick Donkey (Eddie Murphy) and his sidekick Puss In Boots (Antonio Banderas). Will this motley crew be able to ward off the evil Prince Charming (Rupert Everett) and his newly-made army of villainous cohorts? The bigger question is will we laugh in the process? The Shrek series is getting a bit long in the tooth, and Shrek the Third is only a mildly amusing entry in the trilogy.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f9db/7f9dbfc8b6fb7743c88e2459664ba1f133ea81f9" alt=""
To be fair, Shrek the Third is kind of humorous. It sticks to the basic formula of mixing slapstick with referential humor (the school Arthur attends is at “Worcestershire”), only doesn’t hit as often as its predecessors. For a movie like this to crossover, the adults have to enjoy it as much as the kids, and it doesn’t work as much on this level. There are funny bits (especially toward the end as the good guys repel the invasion), but as a whole I found myself snickering when I should have been laughing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da72b/da72b556f0ad17193a6effba89fba3c268c17aec" alt=""
Shrek the Third really just sticks to the formula created previously, and doesn’t deviate much. It succeeds on the level that it’s faithful to the first two movies, but fails in that it doesn’t take on a life of it’s own. It’s sort of feels like a deleted scenes reel: sometimes funny, but not really necessary.
Comments