Children of Men
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8488/f8488dda4227b210528b19403ccd5d74e5fa6da8" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da893/da893af8fae5a1eaa4e393b76817635adb0feb8e" alt=""
Raw Power and Long Takes
Last year was a pretty bad year for the movies. While there were some very good ones, I was disappointed that I had not seen at least one film that I would give my highest rating to. I had heard of a new film from Alfonso CuarĂ³n whose most mainstream success was the third (and best) Harry Potter movie. Never in my wildest dreams would I imagine that this would be the person who would co-write and direct Children of Men, easily the best and most powerful film of 2006, just now going into wider release.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b28b/2b28ba5ff896a4e5b7676d0e34dbc5971184e3e5" alt=""
Children of Men was shot using a hand-held camera for the entirety of the running length. Despite the fact that I typically hate this choice of cinematography, it plays very well here. The camera follows Theo around practically becoming a character in itself, as if it were a documentary. This is reinforced by the very elaborate action setups that play out around the actors often for many minutes between edits. It’s impressive (especially later when the characters enter a war zone), and make the proceedings feel very real.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86924/86924fe761a66268d9e6f81b4da36a9e6b06b01d" alt=""
I also liked the risks the movie takes on the story level. We all know that some twists are coming to end Acts I and II, but I was startled both times at what transpired. The second twist is especially shocking, immediately upping the ante for all involved. This is an excellently constructed story, and at 100 minutes, is just the right length.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b2cc/7b2cc65120c28e79cca87af4803d5d298936bb3d" alt=""
Comments